It follows that the disadvantage of non-incorporation lies in the fact that members are never immune from the responsibility of others. The safest way to run a simple organization is to ensure that the rules specify that no member can bind the association to a contract or expenses without the agreement of the members` body and that all expenses are financed in advance. The nature of a non-legal association is that each member has established legal relations with any other, i.e. through an « inter se » contract. In general, this is done by subscribing to a written constitution. Associations that are not legally competent may also have commercial or commercial objectives or carry out commercial activities. « The assets of a non-legal association are the property of its members, but they are contractually prevented from separating their share, except in accordance with the rules of the association. This type of collective ownership must be, at my discretion, a subtype of a joint lease, but subject to any contractual restrictions that apply between members.  While an unregistered association cannot own the property itself, there are, in the strict sense of the legal term, mechanisms that are used to produce the same effect.  The advantage of non-legal personality and what makes it such a popular choice for an association or corporation is greater freedom to operate than a business or partnership. For example, there is no need to make annual returns. The general principle reflected in the case law is that members are only liable for their dues or dues according to the constitution of the association. This principle stems from the highly cited and approved Wise case v. Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd, in which it was stated that the second reason stems from the fact that all members are collectively responsible for the actions of the association.
The registration of the rules reminds all members of what they can and cannot do and thus helps to reduce the possibility of a person acting in a way that endangers the interests of another member. The second alternative is that the gift to directors or officers, who could be duly considered directors, be held in trust for the purposes of the association in a private trust right. Purpose trusts are not permitted under English law (with the exception of non-profit trusts which release non-profit associations from many of these difficulties), so such gifts fail due to a lack of a beneficiary able to enforce the terms of the trust.  However, Re Denley`s Trust Deed`s decision allows: Some such trusts have been validated and, as a result, the case of Re West Sussex Constabulary`s Widows, Children and Benevolent (1930) Fund Trusts applied this construction to the rights of an unregistered association  A reform of affected trusts, such as. B the application of such a trust by a designated person (z.B. the President or Treasurer) of a beneficiary (of whom there may not be one) would affect the role of the assignment team in the context of the voluntary association.  Since an unregistered association is not a person, it cannot act for itself. The members usually entrust the means and management of the association to a smaller group of its members, the committee (in a small association cannot hold this. For example, in an association of three members, the members can be mentioned each on the bank account and have the same power of action for the association. Alternatively, there can be only one person, not a committee of people acting on behalf of the association. » . .